Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | yungdingo | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | eresopacaso | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Tokens Control , Boros Burn , Boros Forge , Domain Zur Overlords , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Repurpose , Mardu Angels , Mardu Demons , Mono White Tokens
Meta Performance Analysis
High Noon ranks #196 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 48%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.4%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, High Noon is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 18.80 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. High Noon has a win rate of 71.0%, making it 4.9% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 7 | 56.0% | 1 |
| Get Lost | Instant | 12 | 39.0% | 1 |
| Sunfall | Sorcery | 14 | 38.9% | 2 |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 13 | 33.8% | 0 |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 10 | 33.3% | 0 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 9 | 29.6% | 0 |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 7 | 28.8% | 0 |
| Lightning Helix | Instant | 6 | 27.6% | 1 |
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 8 | 27.1% | 0 |
| Lay Down Arms | Sorcery | 7 | 25.0% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with High Noon than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 7 | 77.3% | 71.9% | +5.4% |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 6 | 73.7% | 71.0% | +2.7% |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 8 | 74.5% | 72.2% | +2.3% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 13 | 73.8% | 71.8% | +2.0% |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 2 | 7 | 74.0% | 72.6% | +1.4% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 7 | 73.8% | 73.3% | +0.5% |
| Ride's End | Instant | 5 | 12 | 70.1% | 71.1% | -0.9% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 16 | 71.0% | 72.1% | -1.1% |
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 9 | 73.1% | 74.2% | -1.1% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 13 | 70.8% | 72.1% | -1.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono White Tokens | 14 | 2.3% | 34.5% |
| Unknown Archetype | 10 | 2.8% | 42.7% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 10 | 0.8% | 59.3% |
| Boros Forge | 6 | 17.1% | 28.6% |
| Azorius Control | 4 | 1.1% | 62.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.